Brandon L. Crawford, PhD

Assistant Professor of Applied Health Science


Curriculum vitae



Department of Applied Health Science

School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington



Attitudes toward fetal development-based abortion bans in the United States


Journal article


Brandon L. Crawford, K. Jozkowski, M. Simmons, Malachi Willis, K. LaRoche, R. Turner, Wen-Juo Lo
The Social Science Journal, 2021

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Crawford, B. L., Jozkowski, K., Simmons, M., Willis, M., LaRoche, K., Turner, R., & Lo, W.-J. (2021). Attitudes toward fetal development-based abortion bans in the United States. The Social Science Journal.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Crawford, Brandon L., K. Jozkowski, M. Simmons, Malachi Willis, K. LaRoche, R. Turner, and Wen-Juo Lo. “Attitudes toward Fetal Development-Based Abortion Bans in the United States.” The Social Science Journal (2021).


MLA   Click to copy
Crawford, Brandon L., et al. “Attitudes toward Fetal Development-Based Abortion Bans in the United States.” The Social Science Journal, 2021.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{brandon2021a,
  title = {Attitudes toward fetal development-based abortion bans in the United States},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {The Social Science Journal},
  author = {Crawford, Brandon L. and Jozkowski, K. and Simmons, M. and Willis, Malachi and LaRoche, K. and Turner, R. and Lo, Wen-Juo}
}

Abstract

Previous research indicates that abortion attitudes may vary across different contexts, such as the reason for abortion and gestational age of the pregnancy. To expand on these findings, we examined abortion attitudes as they pertain to fetal development-based bans. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, we assessed correlates of support and opposition to these types of bans and contextualized our quantitative findings by analyzing open-ended responses where participants provided the rationale for their close-ended responses. Approximately half of our sample was supportive of fetal development-based bans at implantation/fertilization or detection of a fetal heartbeat. Participants associated developmental markers with the beginning of ‘real’ life, personal responsibility, and the role of the government in legislating abortion, thereby indicating that these markers function as culturally established symbols. These interpretations are consistent with broader messaging and framing of the pro-life and pro-choice movements in the USA.

📣

News and Social Media Mentions


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in