Journal article
M. Hunt, K. Jozkowski, K. Cleland, Brandon L. Crawford, Wen-Juo Lo, Ron Warren, Heather Vinti
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2021
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2021
Semantic Scholar
DOI
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Hunt, M., Jozkowski, K., Cleland, K., Crawford, B. L., Lo, W.-J., Warren, R., & Vinti, H. (2021). Examining the Effect of a Randomized Media Intervention on Knowledge and Support of Abortion Restrictions: A Case Study in the South. Sexuality Research and Social Policy.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Hunt, M., K. Jozkowski, K. Cleland, Brandon L. Crawford, Wen-Juo Lo, Ron Warren, and Heather Vinti. “Examining the Effect of a Randomized Media Intervention on Knowledge and Support of Abortion Restrictions: A Case Study in the South.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy (2021).
MLA
Click to copy
Hunt, M., et al. “Examining the Effect of a Randomized Media Intervention on Knowledge and Support of Abortion Restrictions: A Case Study in the South.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2021.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{m2021a,
title = {Examining the Effect of a Randomized Media Intervention on Knowledge and Support of Abortion Restrictions: A Case Study in the South},
year = {2021},
journal = {Sexuality Research and Social Policy},
author = {Hunt, M. and Jozkowski, K. and Cleland, K. and Crawford, Brandon L. and Lo, Wen-Juo and Warren, Ron and Vinti, Heather}
}
Abstract
Context: Abortion restrictions diminish access and perpetuate hostility toward abortion seekers. Support for restrictions is high, but at the same time, understanding of restrictions is low. We evaluated the effectiveness of a video intervention designed to increase knowledge of abortion restrictions in Arkansas and evaluated whether hearing a person’s abortion experience changed their support for restrictions.
Methods: Using a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up design, we randomly assigned a convenience sample of Arkansas residents (N = 369) to view one of two video conditions, either information on abortion legislation only or information followed by an abortion testimonial, in 2018. We compared knowledge of abortion restrictions (KAR) and support for abortion restrictions (SAR) across time with repeated-measures analyses of variance and McNemar’s tests.
Results: Knowledge increased over time for both groups and was higher among testimonial-watching participants. The 20-week abortion ban, counseling on “abortion pill reversal,” and 48-hour waiting period yielded the largest knowledge gains for both groups. Support decreased slightly over time but did not differ by video condition.
Conclusions: Combined information and testimonial videos were effective in increasing awareness of Arkansas abortion restrictions, potentially because of repeated information or emotional connections, making the information more memorable. Endorsement of restrictions remained high in the sample.
Policy Implications: Participants in this sample did not seem to interpret abortion restrictions as burdensome, even after being given information in the video, and ended up simultaneously supporting choice to have an abortion and the policies that restrict access.
